Virtual Try-Ons in Fashion: Can AR Truly Replace In-Store Shopping?

Written By Grace Sogbesan

The fashion industry can't stop talking about augmented reality. Virtual try-ons, magic mirrors, and digital showrooms are being hailed as the future of retail. But here's what everyone's tiptoeing around: Do these flashy AR experiences actually convince people to buy clothes?

Let's look at what the data tells us – and more importantly, what it doesn't.

A 2023 Shopify study showed that products with AR content had a 94% higher conversion rate compared to products without AR. Sounds impressive, right? But here's the catch: dig into the methodology and you'll find most of these studies come from furniture and accessories, where size and fit aren't as complex as clothing.

When it comes to fashion, the numbers tell a more nuanced story.

AR By The Numbers:

What's Really Happening

Take Zara's AR app experience. While they reported a 20% decrease in returns in pilot stores (an impressive metric published in their parent company Inditex's annual report), customer feedback forums reveal a different picture. Users frequently mention issues with size accuracy and fabric representation. One customer put it perfectly: "It showed me how the dress would look, but not how it would feel."

This perfectly captures the current state of fashion AR – impressive, but incomplete.

What AR Does Well and Where It Falls Short

The reality is that current AR technology has a split personality:

✓ WHAT AR DOES WELL:

- Shows colours against your skin tone

- Demonstrates basic fit and length

- Helps visualize overall style

- Allows quick comparison between options

✗ WHERE AR FALLS SHORT:

- Accurate fabric drape and movement

- True-to-life fit across different body types

- Texture and material quality visualization

- Consistent sizing recommendations

Behind the Headlines: The Gap Between Engagement and Conversion

Major retailers are sharing mixed results that require careful reading. While Gucci reported a 278% increase in customer engagement with AR features (highlighted in Kering's Digital Innovation Report), they're notably quiet about conversion rates. Similarly, ASOS's AR trials showed high user interaction but moderate impact on purchase decisions according to their technology investment briefing.

The gap between "trying" and "buying" remains significant.

A recent McKinsey State of Fashion Technology Report revealed something fascinating: 62% of consumers say they've used AR for shopping, but only 29% say it significantly influenced their purchase decision. The disconnect? Trust. People love playing with AR features but still hesitate to make final decisions based solely on virtual try-ons.

💡 Industry Insight: "People are excited about AR as an experience, but still cautious about it as a decision-making tool. It's the difference between entertainment and utility." - Fashion Technology Consultant.

The Elephant in the Virtual Fitting Room

Let's talk about the elephant in the room: development costs. Implementing quality AR technology isn't cheap. A basic AR try-on feature can cost retailers anywhere from $30,000 to $100,000 according to Deloitte's Retail Technology Investment Outlook. For the investment to make sense, it needs to drive real sales, not just engagement.

Currently, many brands are finding themselves in a catch-22:

  • Basic AR doesn't convert well enough

  • High-quality AR costs too much to implement widely

  • Consumers expect AR but don't fully trust it

This explains why many retailers are quietly scaling back their AR ambitions while publicly celebrating their innovation.

The Human Element: Why Touch Still Matters in Fashion

The human factor also plays a crucial role that tech enthusiasts often overlook. We're still tactile creatures when it comes to fashion. A 2023 consumer behavior study published in the International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management found that 73% of shoppers still prefer to touch and feel clothes before buying, even if they've used AR features.

It seems our trust in technology has limits, especially when it comes to personal appearance

Not All AR is Created Equal

But it's not all skepticism. Some categories are showing genuinely promising results:

Eyewear: Virtual try-ons have increased conversion rates by up to 85% (Warby Parker Investor Relations, 2023)
Makeup: AR-enabled product pages show 2.5x higher engagement (L'Oréal Digital Report, 2023)
Accessories: Virtual try-ons reduce returns by 35% (Fashion Innovation Agency Report, 2023)

Notice something? The more standardized the product, the better AR performs. A lipstick shade translates well to AR; a flowing summer dress with complex draping does not.

The Path Forward

So where does this leave us? AR in fashion isn't a failure – it's just not the complete solution many promised it would be. It's proving to be an excellent tool for initial discovery and narrowing down choices, but not necessarily the final decision-maker.

Looking ahead, the technology needs to address several key challenges:

  1. More accurate body mapping across diverse body types

  2. Better fabric physics simulation

  3. Integration with real customer reviews and photos

  4. Improved size recommendation algorithms

The most promising development I've seen is the shift toward hybrid approaches. Some brands are finding success by using AR as part of the shopping journey rather than the whole journey. Think virtual try-ons for initial selection, followed by home try-ons with easy returns. It's less about replacing traditional shopping methods and more about enhancing them.

The Smart Retailer's Approach

For retailers considering AR investment, the key questions shouldn't be just about the technology itself, but about their specific customer needs:

Ask Yourself:

  • What are your current return rates and reasons?

  • Which products cause the most sizing uncertainty?

  • What's your customer's comfort level with technology?

  • How can AR complement, rather than replace, existing experiences?

The Realistic Future

AR in fashion isn't a magic bullet – it's a tool, and like any tool, its value depends on how and where it's used. While the technology continues to evolve, the most successful implementations will likely be those that recognize both its capabilities and limitations, using it to enhance rather than replace the traditional shopping experience.

After all, fashion remains deeply personal and tactile. Perhaps the real question isn't whether AR works, but whether we're asking it to do too much, too soon.

References

Grace Sogbesan
Next

Why This Marketer is a Brand Loyalist